WEEK 5: UNCOVERING EARTH’S SYSTEMSLab—Mini-Conference #1 For this first mini-conference assignment, you should read the sample labs below. These were created by ‘imaginary’ students for you to practice critiquing, and they have deliberate errors in them (therefore, you need to actively look for them, just as peer reviews in the real science world do). You will submit your critiques to me in the assignments area. After you’ve had the practice doing this and getting my feedback, for the third mini-conference, you and your classmates will be critiquing each others’ Phase V lab work that you’ll post in the forum. Then, for the final symposium poster project, you will also critique one another’s work. Answer the following questions about the labs you read. Please keep your comments to constructive criticism (in other words, offer feedback, but be polite). For each question, answer ‘Yes,’ ‘No,’ or ‘Maybe,’ and provide detail. Detail doesn’t just mean a full sentence like ‘Yes, enough evidence has been collected’. Your answers must make it clear that you have read and thought about the reports. These answers do not need to be long, but remember that you’re learning to provide feedback that will help your classmates to improve their work in future labs, so be as detailed as you can. Upload this assignment to the Assignments area of the classroom. 1) Is the step-by-step procedure sufficient to yield the necessary evidence needed to fully answer the listed research question? Think about whether you would be able to follow the procedure to get evidence that can answer the question. 2) Has enough evidence been collected for this specific research question? 3) Have they claimed more than the evidence supports? This is a very important question to ask when reading about scientific studies (or perhaps not-so-scientific studies) in the news. 4) Have assumptions impacted their results? Think about lab 1. We made the assumption that the galaxies that appear in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field are all the same size, so the ones that are larger are closer to us, and the smaller ones are farther away. If the conclusion involves distance, then the researcher needs to acknowledge that that assumption about size was made. 5) Does the claim directly answer the original research question? The conclusion should completely answer the question and not go beyond the original question. 6) Precisely what should the researchers have done or reported differently to improve their inquiry research project? Mini-Conference #1 Sample Research Reports Instructions: All details for completing this lab are in the weekly lesson. Download the provided documents, which contain sample lab reports. Carefully follow all instructions in the lesson to review all three lab reports using the provided questions. You may submit your work as an uploaded document or directly in the comments box. Answer the six questions for each sample lab report separately and keep all answers for each sample report together. Example: Report 1- Question 1- Question 2- Question 3- Question 4- Question 5- Question 6 Submission: Upload your assignment as a Word document here. Rubric: Your score will be based on the following rubric for each sample report (9 points total for the assignment). 3 points – All questions answered completely in complete sentences, citing specific details from the sample lab report, pointing out the built-in errors.2 points – Built-in errors are pointed out, lacking specific details.1 point – Review does not point out built-in errors; specific details not cited.0 points – Sample lab report not reviewed, or not reviewed using required questions.
by admin | Sep 23, 2022 | Science | 0 comments
WEEK 5: UNCOVERING EARTH’S SYSTEMSLabâMini-Conference #1Â Â For this first mini-conference assignment, you should read the sample…
A professional Academic Service Provider
Distinguished Writers Ensure Accountability, Confidentiality, High-Quality, and Timely Execution
Distinguished Writers comprises of well-trained professionals striving to give our clients an awesome experience. We engage with our customers throughout the learning process to ensure they are comfortable with both their classwork and homework in order to achieve excellent grades. The team is well-balanced across different fields to suit our clients. Our diversified fields include article writing, thesis proposals, project management, coursework, essay writing, and dissertations among others.Fundamental Values
1. Accountability: The company values professionalism in all our undertakings. As such, we interact transparently with our customers.
2. Confidentiality: The company does not disclose anything to third-parties, and our interactions with customers remain confidential.
3. High-Quality The products are thoroughly proofread and counter-checked to ensure they meet the expected quality levels.
Guarantees
4. Quality is a Guarantee: Our writers are accurately matched with their area of expertise to ensure proper quality is maintained. We are also equipped with adequate software to guarantee error-free products.
5. Money Back Policy: As a client-oriented service, we offer 100% refund for the following: if we received a double payment from you; if you placed similar orders twice (or more) and paid for all of them; the writer has not been assigned; you asked to cancel the order within 20 minutes after placing it; an e-Check payment has been sent (the Dispute Manager will contact you accordingly). Other cases involve a comprehensive investigation by the Dispute Department and feedback given within 24 hours. We value our customers; therefore, the process will be fair, fast, and precise.
5 .Free Revisions: You can request for revisions at no additional cost. Nonetheless, this does not include complete change of the initial order instructions and if it is not past ten days upon your approval.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Our support staff are always online to provide any assistance when needed
Ordering Process
NOTE: If you have any question, always contact our support team before the commencement of your project. ALL THE BEST”:
Recent Comments